Fall fishing has been more inconsistent this year in comparison to other years. What do you think of this theory for the generalized affects of metabolism/water temp to feeding activity? In other words, the rate of temperature drop directly affects metabolism and therefore feeding, but a delayed feeding-activity rate is dependent upon and follows temperature-fluctuations higher and into, temperature stability.
scenario 1. For example, the temp drops 6 or 7 degrees do to a noreaster, snow, sleet and cold wind. Fish go into a stupor regardless of stomach contents.
scenario 2. Fish fed big time during stable temperatures over a period of time, especially if the water went up 5 degrees and forage was readily available.
scenario 3. A slow drop in water temp occurs due to frosty nights and cooler daytime air temps. (a) The fish have undigested meals in their stomachs that were consumed during higher metabolic activity but, (b) will not digest the food until needed during periods of slowed-down metabolism, due to the colder water (just like in winter) and (c) will feed far less per week.
Indian summer may be here (above the surface), but the fish's metabolism hasn't caught up to the slowly, warming water temps, thus only pickerel are biting (which they are). Once prey activity increases, fish begin to see this as a cue to feed more based on the feeding-escalator driven by their energy level versus replenishment-need versus consumption.
Therefore, fishing at the end of a stable and higher temperature,
regardless of drops in air temperature, puts one in position to catch fish even in a snow storm!(which has occured to anglers I know of), because increased digestion and emptying, make room for more food. (I don't know that the meaning of the word hunger is the same for fish as it is in humans, so I have to assume that at some basic level, the simpler escalator model exists.)
What's your take?
FrankM
scenario 1. For example, the temp drops 6 or 7 degrees do to a noreaster, snow, sleet and cold wind. Fish go into a stupor regardless of stomach contents.
scenario 2. Fish fed big time during stable temperatures over a period of time, especially if the water went up 5 degrees and forage was readily available.
scenario 3. A slow drop in water temp occurs due to frosty nights and cooler daytime air temps. (a) The fish have undigested meals in their stomachs that were consumed during higher metabolic activity but, (b) will not digest the food until needed during periods of slowed-down metabolism, due to the colder water (just like in winter) and (c) will feed far less per week.
Indian summer may be here (above the surface), but the fish's metabolism hasn't caught up to the slowly, warming water temps, thus only pickerel are biting (which they are). Once prey activity increases, fish begin to see this as a cue to feed more based on the feeding-escalator driven by their energy level versus replenishment-need versus consumption.
Therefore, fishing at the end of a stable and higher temperature,
regardless of drops in air temperature, puts one in position to catch fish even in a snow storm!(which has occured to anglers I know of), because increased digestion and emptying, make room for more food. (I don't know that the meaning of the word hunger is the same for fish as it is in humans, so I have to assume that at some basic level, the simpler escalator model exists.)
What's your take?
FrankM